Dent v. Holder
9th Cir.
627 F.3d 365 (9th Cir. 2010)
2010
Holding
Courts retain jurisdiction to review legal questions and constitutional claims arising from hardship determinations even when the ultimate hardship finding is unreviewable; due process and legal error claims may be cognizable.
Practitioner Note
Identifies the narrow exceptions to the jurisdictional bar on hardship review.
This summary describes what the tribunal held. Always verify the citation and read the full decision before relying on it. Case law changes — confirm this decision has not been overruled, limited, or superseded. Not legal advice.